(Im)Mobility Regimes in Times of Crisis: Concluding Remarks

05.11.2024 , in ((Crises and (Im)mobility Regimes)) , ((Pas de commentaires))
et

Recent crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine have reshaped how people can move – or are held back – revealing deep inequalities. In these moments, « (im)mobility regimes » are renegotiated, exposing the power structures and actors involved. By exploring changes in (im)mobility regimes in times of crises ...

+ En lire plus

Mobility and Immobility in International Migration Trajectories

24.10.2024 , in ((Crises and (Im)mobility Regimes)) , ((Pas de commentaires))

The definition of migration has been subject to long conceptual discussions throughout history. Studies that investigate human migrations crossing national borders have failed to adequately account for the notion of mobility. One of the central objectives of the nccr – on the move is to explore the interconnectedness of migration ...

+ En lire plus

Lessons from COVID-19: Transformative Categories and Mobility Regimes

16.10.2024 , in ((Crises and (Im)mobility Regimes)) , ((Pas de commentaires))

In the COVID-19 pandemic, foreign-born workers contributed to maintaining the essential services on which the UK depends. They faced the double edge of public gratitude in contrast with insecure working and living conditions, compounded by often precarious immigration status. Recognizing the essential worker status could be a catalyst for transformative ...

+ En lire plus

Des limites (im)perceptibles : l'(im)mobilité pendant la pandémie

03.10.2024 , in ((Crises and (Im)mobility Regimes)) , ((Pas de commentaires))
et

L’accord sur la libre circulation des personnes entre la Suisse et l’UE est entré en vigueur en juin 2002. Depuis, les Suisse·sse·s et les citoyen·ne·s de l’UE économiquement actif·ve·s peuvent se déplacer librement entre les frontières nationales. Lorsque la pandémie COVID-19 a éclaté, ces frontières ont été fermées pour la ...

+ En lire plus