17.04.2019 , in ((Politique))
, ((Pas de commentaires))
Marion Panizzon et Daniela Vitiello
In the first part of this blog post, we analyzed why the GCM’s vision of ‘interconnecting’ migration-specific to migration-related policies delivers gains, including more room for negotiated outcomes, while at the same time increasing the risk of watering down human rights protection. This second part evaluates the evolution of institutions
...
+ En lire plus
11.04.2019 , in ((Politique))
, ((Pas de commentaires))
Marion Panizzon et Daniela Vitiello
Does the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) fulfill the criteria of a legal regime for international migration or is it just another soft law cooperation framework? If the GCM is merely a state-led cooperation framework, then what is its contribution to international migration law (IML)?
...
+ En lire plus
23.05.2017 , in ((Politique))
, ((Pas de commentaires))
Daniela Vitiello
The EU relocation mechanism for Italy and Greece promised to be the first fully-fledged experiment of “non-just-financial” solidarity among EU Member States in the field of asylum. After more than a year of implementation, its shortcomings appear as clear as the sun in the summer sky. However, it holds some merits, primarily to have shown the advantages of a better integration of NGOs in the governance of asylum redistributive schemes. The same NGOs are now under attack. Why?
...
+ En lire plus